A bit about Germans in the CW . . .

By Heather Clancy, ’15 In a changing historical landscape that is constantly evolving to include complexities of race, gender, regional identity, social class, and more into our dialogue about the past, ethnicity is a factor in historical analysis…

By Heather Clancy ’15

In a changing historical landscape that is constantly evolving to include complexities of race, gender, regional identity, social class, and more into our dialogue about the past, ethnicity is a factor in historical analysis that is becoming difficult to ignore. Indeed, in this era fraught with ongoing immigration disputes and the resultant beginnings of a full-on American identity crisis for some, viewing historical events such as the Civil War through the lens of ethnicity is an absolute necessity. German-American immigrants were one group which participated robustly in the Civil War, but whose story is often overshadowed.

Continue reading “A bit about Germans in the CW . . .”

Isaac E. Avery and the 6th North Carolina

By Avery C. Lentz, ’14 When I walk out on the battlefield, I always make sure I go to the monuments of the units where my ancestors served, so I can pay my respects to the fallen. One of my ancestors was Henry Lentz in the 149th Pennsylvania Volun…

By Avery C. Lentz ’14

When I walk out on the battlefield, I always make sure I go to the monuments of the units where my ancestors served, so I can pay my respects to the fallen. One of my ancestors was Henry Lentz in the 149th Pennsylvania Volunteers.  Recently, I found out that I don’t just have an ancestor on the Union side, but also, one who fought for the Confederacy.   From what my grandmother has told me, my first name comes from her maiden name, which in turn, comes from the Avery Family of North Carolina. This family has an old history tracing roots to colonial New England as well as being prominent cotton planters in North Carolina. Isaac E. Avery is one of the many from the Avery family in North Carolina.  He died while fighting at Cemetery Hill on the second day of the Battle of Gettysburg.

Cemetery_hill

Continue reading “Isaac E. Avery and the 6th North Carolina”

Gettysburg College: A Memorial Landmark

by Tricia Runzel, ’13 As a Gettysburg College student it is impossible to escape the Civil War in my daily life. Surrounded by battlefield, including portions of our own campus, walking on the same ground as the soldiers, and working in buildings …

By Tricia Runzel ’13

As a Gettysburg College student it is impossible to escape the Civil War in my daily life. Surrounded by battlefield, including portions of our own campus, walking on the same ground as the soldiers, and working in buildings that witnessed the tragedy of the Battle of Gettysburg makes the war inescapable. The college’s role in the battle has become famous in campus lore for its use as an observation point and hospital during and after the battle. Still standing Pennsylvania Hall, known as the College Edifice at the time of the battle, once housed the wounded and dying on campus.

Penn_hall
Courtesy of Special Collections, Musselman Library, Gettysburg College.

Continue reading “Gettysburg College: A Memorial Landmark”

Fortenbaugh Lecture Review: The Dimensions of Freedom

By Drew Hoffman, ’15 On the crisp night of November 19th, the Majestic Theater in Gettysburg filled to hear Dr. Steven Hahn deliver the 51st Annual Fortenbaugh Lecture. His lecture sought to explore the relationship between Native and African-Amer…

By Drew Hoffman ’15

On the crisp night of November 19th, the Majestic Theater in Gettysburg filled to hear Dr. Steven Hahn deliver the 51st Annual Fortenbaugh Lecture.  His lecture sought to explore the relationship between Native and African-American experiences during the Civil War and Reconstruction and changes to the American state as a result of the war.  Hahn presented the convincing argument that the Reconstruction Era history of both groups fed the momentum of that change.Hahn Continue reading “Fortenbaugh Lecture Review: The Dimensions of Freedom”

Two Lectures by Professor Allen Guelzo Reviewed

???Liberty and Union???: November 14, 2012 Reviewed by Alex Barlowe, ’14 On Wednesday, November 14th, in the Kline Theatre of Gettysburg College, Professor Allen Guelzo delivered his lecture, ???Liberty and Union???, as the second of his four part series …

 

Guelzo

Continue reading “Two Lectures by Professor Allen Guelzo Reviewed”

Treason or Slander?

by Gabby Hornbeck, ’13 On July 4th, 1863, Henry J. Stahle, editor of the Gettysburg Compiler was arrested and sent to Fort McHenry in Baltimore, Maryland. He was accused of “copperhead treason” in the form of informing a “rebel colonel” during the…

By Gabby Hornbeck ’13

On July 4th, 1863, Henry J. Stahle, editor of the Gettysburg Compiler was arrested and sent to Fort McHenry in Baltimore, Maryland. He was accused of “copperhead treason” in the form of informing “a rebel colonel” during the first day of the Battle of Gettysburg.(1) In speaking of his discussion with General Morris upon his forced return to Fort McHenry in late July of 1863, Stahle wrote,

We suspected that some fiendish political opponent was at the bottom of it, and we could afford to suffer more yet in order to discover him–and hoped Gen. Morris had now evidence enough to enable us to place our finger upon the very man. We asked him why he ordered our return. He replied, ‘a letter from Gettysburg.’ We asked to see it, and it was produced. There it was!–in the hand-writing of and signed by D. McCONAUGHY (2)

Continue reading “Treason or Slander?”

Some Limitations on Reunion

by Drew Hoffman, ’15 Five years after the last shot was fired at Gettysburg, it would be the project of Captain David McConaughy of Adams County, PA to bring officers who had fought in the battle back to Gettysburg. David McConaughy was attempting…

By Drew Hoffman ’15

Five years after the last shot was fired at Gettysburg, it would be the project of Captain David McConaughy of Adams County, PA to bring officers who had fought in the battle back to Gettysburg.  David McConaughy was attempting something big for August 23, 1869.  His plan was for a reunion of generals from both sides to come back to Gettysburg.  He also sought to compile information about the positions of all the units that fought in the battle in order to create a detailed account for posterity.

However, what McConaughy proposed was really unprecedented in 1869.  Some in the press believed it could be a major flop.  Even McConaughy’s good friend, Samuel Crawford wrote from Alabama that, “I fear you will not have any representation from the South.  There are many officers and soldiers of Hood’s Division around me and from them [I] have learned some very interesting facts.  They do not seem inclined to go to Gettysburg for the purpose indicated.”

In fact, the reunion was largely only attended by soldiers of the Army of the Potomac, rather than both sides of the battle: only two southerners would eventually show up.  Certainly, generals who had played massive roles in the battle such as Robert E. Lee and George Sykes did not attend.  Positive replies came in mostly from mid-level Union officers.  Why was this? Was it because too little time had elapsed since the guns fell silent? Was it also because southern generals spitefully were shunning the memory of a battle in which they lost?

A reply from John Gibbon is telling.  Gibbon, a veteran who served under Confederate General Ewell during the battle wrote from Utah in 1869:  “I sincerely regret my inability to be present at such a interesting meeting as your propose, and I fear that the meeting is so close at hand and my station so remote that I can be but of little assistance to you in corresponding [. . .]”

The distance involved in such a trip must have seemed almost insurmountable to Gibbon.  Extensive travel in 1869 was difficult even with the growing system if railways being built throughout the country.  For many others, the costs associated with travel were a vexing problem.  Many veterans including William L. Tilton conditioned their attendance on receiving compensation for these expenses, stating: “[I] will come if I can have a pass over the several railways from Boston to Gettysburg.”  If it was expensive for a former Union general to go from Massachusetts to Pennsylvania, it must have been a pretty penny for Crawford’s men in Alabama to attend.  With such factors to be taken into consideration, it is easier to understand why the majority of officers who attended McConaughy’s reunion were from adjacent states, such as Ohio and New York.

The immense distances involved in trying to gather men together was something that stretched the limits of the speed of the travel of communication and people.  While the idea of returning to the battlefield appealed to countless veterans, these limitations would prove to be a significant blow to the regional balance on McConaughy’s attendance roster that August in 1869.  It would take another 44 years before McConaughy’s dream could be realized at the battle’s bicentennial in 1913.


Sources:

David McConaughy Collection.  Gettysburg:  Musselman Library, Gettysburg College. Blight, David W.  Beyond the Battlefield:  Race, memory, and the American Civil War.  Boston:  University of Massachusetts Press, 2002.  120-125.

“The Gettysburg Reunion.”  The Philadelphia Inquirer, August 24, 1869.

Weeks, Jim.  Gettysburg:  Memory, Market, and an American Shrine.  Princeton:  Princeton University Press, 2003.  105.

“We see this as part of our duty to continue the work of our veterans”: The Kentucky State Monument at Vicksburg

by Michele Seabrook, ’14 Further complicating an already contentious struggle over the collective national memory of the Civil War and its aftermath were the legacies of the war in border states like Missouri and Kentucky. These were especially vo…

By Michele Seabrook ’14

Further complicating an already contentious struggle over the collective national memory of the Civil War and its aftermath were the legacies of the war in border states like Missouri and  Kentucky. These were especially volatile states, each experiencing fierce internal conflicts, as citizens struggled to pick a side. Kentucky experienced a great deal of inner turmoil, eventually joining the Union cause, although faced with the specter of a Confederate shadow government that quickly formed within the state and pledged loyalty to the Confederacy. Although this shadow administration had little effect on the governing of Kentucky, it did represent a great deal of people who cast their fate with the Confederate cause. The central star on the ubiquitous Confederate Battle Flag is representative of Kentucky, signifying not only the state’s tumultuous position during the war, but also the difficulties that arise in attempting to define Kentucky’s continued Civil War legacy.

Ky_memorial

Continue reading ““We see this as part of our duty to continue the work of our veterans”: The Kentucky State Monument at Vicksburg”

Five Questions with Scott Hartwig

by Sarah Johnson, ’15 This past week I was given the opportunity to interview D. Scott Hartwig, Chief Historian of the Gettysburg National Military Park. I was able to ask him several questions and these are his answers. 1) Your new book, To Antie…

By Sarah Johnson ’15

This past week I was given the opportunity to interview D. Scott Hartwig, Chief Historian of the Gettysburg National Military Park. I was able to ask him several questions and these are his answers.

Img_1363 Continue reading “Five Questions with Scott Hartwig”

Event Review: “The Coming of War”

by Emily Weinick, ’13 On October 17th in Kline Theater, Dr. Allen C. Guelzo delivered ???The Coming of the War???, the first lecture in his four part series entitled ???A Walk Through the Civil War???. Dr. Guelzo guided the audience through the sequence o…

By Emily Weinick ’13

On October 17th in Kline Theater, Dr. Allen C. Guelzo delivered “The Coming of the War”, the first lecture in his four part series entitled “A Walk Through the Civil War”. Dr. Guelzo guided the audience through the sequence of events leading up to the Civil War. He told the story of the Industrial Revolution, slavery, territorial expansionism, political turmoil, and secession. He absolutely captivated the audience with his spellbinding speaking.  

Guelzo began his lecture at the turn of the nineteenth century by describing how the invention of steam-powered machines made the world a smaller place. In 1775, farmers ate what they grew, made their own clothes, and were unaware of the world outside of their farms and communities. However, by the 1780s, the Industrial Revolution began to replace human and animal power with steam powered machines. The steam engine promoted a globalized market, encouraging entrepreneurs to pursue business ventures. Thomas Jefferson initially resisted this new economic world. However, as Guelzo went on to say, Jefferson quickly changed his view on Industrialization with the invention of a machine that would change American industry: the cotton gin.

The invention of the cotton gin went hand-in-hand with the resurgence of slavery in America. In nineteenth century America there was plenty of work and not enough hands to do it.  Slavery was a quick fix to the problem. But, as Guelzo pointed out, slavery was an expensive proposition and paradoxical for many Northerners. Those who did not have the land or funds to support a host of slaves could not rely on slave labor and the institution of slavery smacked hard against the ideals of the Revolutionary War – independence from the tyranny of others. Many thought slavery would disappear as the land was becoming over tilled: large slave states like Virginia even saw a reduction in slaves. But, as Dr. Guelzo reminded us, Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin. With Southern soil supporting the growth of cotton, soon 57% of all American exports would be slave-cultivated cotton. By mid-century, as Guelzo said, “slavery was expanding, not dying.”

With this resurgence in slavery, there was also an increase in opposition to it. The Missouri Compromise seemed to assuage Northerners fear of the expansion of slavery as it limited which states could hold slaves. However, the Compromise of 1850 changed this. Now settlers of the newly acquired Mexican territories would decide what type of state they wanted to be – slave or free. With this compromise, Guelzo pointed out two issues. For one, a decision on slavery would be delayed until settlers filled the territories.  More importantly, the idea of popular sovereignty was a precarious one. In the wake of the Compromise of 1850 the Republican Party was formed.

The 1860 election proved crucial and Lincoln’s election the catalyst for war. The secession of southern states led to a political crisis for the new president.  Guelzo indicated that neither Jefferson Davis nor Lincoln wanted war in the spring of 1861; however they each wanted different things. Davis wished for a peaceful secession, one in which the southern states were left alone. Lincoln wished for peace, but he also wanted to abide by the federal constitution and preserve the union.

Neither President got what they wished for. On April 12 of 1861, Fort Sumter in Charleston, South Carolina was bombarded by the Confederates. The Fort symbolized a domination of the Union over the Confederacy and mocked their secession. Guelzo explained that Lincoln was forced to punish the Confederacy for their actions. His punishment came in the form of a hodgepodge army that invaded Virginia in the first battle of Bull Run. The equally disorganized Confederates managed to drive back the Union and they returned to Washington unsuccessful. Guelzo ended the lecture explaining that Bull Run did not convince Lincoln that war was futile, but that a new and organized army with an experienced general was necessary.

We will hear a continuation of Professor Guelzo’s “A Walk Through the Civil War” on Wednesday, November 14, 2012 at Gettysburg College.

css.php